They Are Lying to You About Israel. Here Is the Inescapable Truth.

Let’s be brutally honest. The world is being sold a poisonous and convenient lie. You are being told a story of Israeli aggression, of chaos, of a humanitarian catastrophe conflated and twisted to serve a dark agenda. You are being asked to look away from the real monster, the puppet master pulling the strings of global terror from its dark throne in Tehran.

The choice you are being presented is a false one. This has never been a morally ambiguous conflict between two flawed parties. It is, and always has been, a battle between a nation that cherishes life and a regime that worships death. It is a battle between a vibrant, messy, life-affirming democracy and a tyrannical, genocidal death cult. And in this battle, there is no middle ground.

The Anatomy of a Global Deception

For weeks, your screens have been filled with a carefully constructed narrative of deception. They have taken a conflict of necessity against the Iranian regime—the world’s chief exporter of terror—and cynically fused it with the tragedy in Gaza. They flash images of suffering, amplified by reports from sources that conveniently ignore the core truth: every civilian casualty is a tragedy engineered and desired by a terror apparatus that embeds itself among the innocent.

They want you to see Israeli soldiers as monsters based on slanted reports, to create a “killing field” narrative that absolves the true villains. They want you to forget who started this fire, who funds the proxies, who supplies the rockets, and who has, for decades, openly and proudly declared its intention to wipe a sovereign nation off the map.

They show you state-managed funerals in Tehran, with crowds herded into the streets, and they call it “national unity.” How we must hold in cold contempt the intelligence of anyone who believes this charade. Are we to believe that a populace suffocating under the boot of the Revolutionary Guard—a people who have been rising up and crying out for freedom for years—suddenly weeps for the architects of their oppression? These are not tears of grief; they are the stage-managed theatrics of a totalitarian regime, a lie broadcast to a gullible world.

And what of the claims of a “pyrrhic victory”? They point to our internal debates, our passionate protests, and our political arguments as signs of weakness. How profoundly they misunderstand. What they call chaos, we call democracy. What they see as fracture, we see as the messy, beautiful, and undeniable strength of a free society grappling with impossible choices. We mourn our losses, yes. We sacrificed irreplaceable research. We paid a heavy price. But this was a price paid to prevent the ultimate catastrophe: a nuclear-armed Iran holding a gun to the head of the world.

A History of Patience Pushed to the Brink

This was not a choice made in haste. This was the agonizing culmination of a decades-long assault. For years, Israel endured. We watched as Iran built its ring of fire, arming Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, the Houthis in Yemen, and militias in Syria and Iraq. We intercepted their weapons, thwarted their plots, and absorbed their attacks, both direct and by proxy.

For years, we pleaded with the world. We presented the intelligence. We pointed to the centrifuges spinning faster and faster, to the enriched uranium stockpiles growing beyond any civilian need. We warned that diplomacy was being used as a smokescreen, a tactic by a regime that lies by its very nature to buy time. We had hoped, with a hope that now feels painfully naive, that the world would act. That the self-proclaimed defenders of the liberal order would stand up to a regime that stones women, executes homosexuals, and chants “Death to America, Death to Israel” in its parliament.

But the world dithered. The deal-makers made excuses. And the clock ticked down to a “point of no return.” The moment when the Iranian regime’s nuclear ambition would become a nuclear reality was no longer a distant threat; it was imminent. Faced with the choice between acting to defend our families and our future, or waiting passively for our own annihilation, we did what any sane, sovereign nation would do. We chose survival.

The Unbridgeable Gulf Between Light and Darkness

“Operation Am Kelavi” was not an act of aggression; it was an act of profound moral clarity. It was a surgical strike, a feat of stunning technological and intelligence superiority, that targeted the head of the serpent. We did not target civilians. We targeted the IRGC terror masters, the nuclear scientists, and the infrastructure of mass destruction that threatened every man, woman, and child in the region and beyond.

Let us draw the contrast in the starkest terms. Israel uses its genius to build Iron Domes to protect its people from indiscriminate rocket fire. The Iranian regime uses its resources to build terror tunnels under hospitals and schools. We name our military operations after the moral imperative to defend our people. They name their militias after religious martyrs in their pursuit of global jihad.

This action was a blow for freedom. It was a favor to the long-suffering people of Iran, who deserve to be free from the fanatics who have stolen their country. And it was a necessary act of service to the entire world. A world without the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is a better, safer, more moral world. That is not a debatable point; it is a self-evident truth.

Why This Was an Act of De-escalation, Not War

To the critics who scream “escalation,” you fail to grasp the cold, hard logic of deterrence. Allowing a genocidal, apocalyptic regime to acquire the ultimate weapon is the most reckless escalation imaginable. It would have initiated a nuclear arms race across the most volatile region on earth and given the world’s leading terrorist state the power of nuclear blackmail.

The Israeli strike was not the start of a war. It was a decisive action to prevent a far more horrific one. By decapitating the command structure and crippling key assets, we did not provoke a wider conflict; we paralyzed it. We restored a measure of deterrence that had been dangerously eroded. We chose a limited, painful, but necessary action now to avert a global nightmare later.

To argue that a nation must wait for the mushroom cloud to form over its cities before it has the right to act is not just strategically foolish; it is morally bankrupt.

The choice, therefore, remains clear. The world can continue to indulge the lies of a terrorist state and its legion of amplifiers in the media and activist circles. Or it can open its eyes and stand with the one nation that had the courage to confront the darkness before it consumed us all. History will judge the silence and the complicity of this moment with unforgiving severity.

What can you do?

• Share this truth. Do not allow the cynical narrative to stand unchallenged in your conversations, online and offline.
• Demand accountability from the media. Ask them why they amplify the propaganda of a terrorist regime while questioning the self-defense of a democracy.
• Tell your elected officials to stand with Israel. Remind them that Israel is on the front line of a war that is not just its own, but a war for the future of the free world.
• Do not be silent. In the battle between civilization and barbarism, your voice is a weapon. Use it.